Sunday, March 15, 2015

Leading School Improvement: Discourses with what schools know and can do


Leading School Improvement: Discourses with what schools know and can do
 
INTRODUCTION
 
How much evidence is out there that could spark off “Discourses on Leading School Improvement”? For how much longer can we in India afford to ignore questions related to - ‘What School Leaders think’ (cognitive), ‘What school leaders say’ (linguistic) and ‘How school leaders tend to behave’ (conative) that address, identity orientation, legitimacy, justification, transparency, posture consistency and commitment of School Heads.

 
Schooling in India is a complex and diverse landscape.  The historic concept of public education as a way to level the playing field has yet to be fulfilled. A vast majority - lacking cultural capital or economic power to identify and gain access to better schooling choices for their children - are condemned to grovel in the sordid systems that continue to fail them. Reason and passion that is bold, unforgiving, strategic, and compassionate are needed to make any real difference to interrupt the glaring inequities in our classrooms and schools.

 
Despite the depressing degrees to which school heads in India have been domesticated often to managerial roles, a  new optimism that schools must transform is placing greater responsibility on School Heads as managers and leaders and the significant roles they play in facilitating a difference in the ways schools can be managed and led. Consequently, leadership for school improvement is a central theme to current policy concerns both in India and internationally.

 
Discourses on Leadership for School Improvement (DLSI)

 
An awareness of the various problematics this inchoate field of school leadership offers, Discourses on Leadership for School Improvement (DLSI) calls on school heads and educators to explore the fact that there is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept like school leadership and therefore the need to relentlessly pursue a radical reconceptualisation of school leadership as a contextually embedded and physically embodied phenomenon.

 
The inchoate field of Leadership challenges schools around the world and in India to rethink their missions and to re-structure their courses, and life on campus. School Heads increasingly exposed to notions of Leadership, which are emotionally, politically, ethically, and scientifically charged would do well to explore collaborative discourses on leading school improvement.

 
DLSI has the potential to facilitate original and surprising explorations to perennial questions such as 'What is leadership?' and 'How do leaders lead change?' Given the urgent need for new voices amongst the crowded field of leadership advocates, DLSI could set off not just new ‘answers’, but an entirely new way of thinking about leadership and its role in contemporary schools and society.

 
DLSI could serve to initiate leadership conversations to empower school heads to deal with conflicting norms and values, uncertain outcomes and futures, and a changing knowledge base. Aware of the need to be able to contextualize knowledge in an increasingly globalized society, DLSI explores leadership not only as an outcome and a process of learning, but as a catalyst for educational change and institutional innovation.

 
Mindful of the many emerging spaces and voices, DLSI provides a space for educators, family members, students and community members to speak their truths, push against the mainstream, and rattle the status quo. DLSI could attempt to capture and weave stories, experiences, practices, and ideas together and unleash the power that school heads, educators have to tell their truth, to face what we do not know, and to learn together - how to transform our schools for the sake of our children. DLSI practitioners are called and challenged to move the discourse about school change beyond remedies that address the symptoms to strategic thinking, planning, and action that address what causes India to have a failing public school system.

 
With Aristotle we declare that the ultimate test of understanding rests on the ability to transform one's knowledge into leadership. Those who can, do. Those who understand, lead.